Click on the presentation title for the presenter’s abstract.
Speaker biographies can be found under the speaker tab.
*The Program is subject to change.
Universal Design Conference – Day One: Monday 17 May 2021
|9:00||Opening Housekeeping and Welcome: MC Ms Michele Barry Welcome to country (TBA)|
|9:20||Welcome Address: Stefano Scalzo, Executive General Manager, Victorian Health & Building Authority|
|9:30||Keynote: Five Pillars of Inclusive Smart Cities James Thurston, Vice President Global Strategy, G3ict (Virtual Presentation)|
Mobility Scooters In the Wild: Users’ Resilience and Innovation. Theresa Harada, University of Wollongong
Recent research in Australia on mobility scooter users highlights that the built environment does not cater for their inclusion. The mobility scooter as an assistive transport technology is vital in ensuring access to public services to ensure health and wellbeing for people with mobility impairments. In this paper, we examine how users are co-producing urban design through their practices performed ‘out in the wild’. We identify the pressing considerations for how mobility scooter users both survive and thrive. First, mobility scooters, as electric powered mobility devices (PMDs), face similar legislative and regulatory issues to e-scooters and other niche innovations currently being trialled on city streets that both solve problems and create them for urban governance. How to create inclusive policies for PMD users that allow safe travel and easy access is currently not well understood. Second, the impact of climate change on energy systems is creating momentum for renewable power and smart systems that will in turn impact decisions and policies around electrified private and public transport and associated energy infrastructure. It is important that mobility scooters are not overlooked in planning for inter-modal electrified transport. Third, national and international efforts to achieve safer and more sustainable ‘car free’ cities to reduce congestion and increase liveability need to include design for PMD users. This could potentially provide spaces for greater inclusivity and social integration of PMD users through the design of public and private spaces. Finally, an ageing population globally is set to encourage demand for technologies and accompanying infrastructure to facilitate mobility into senior years. Given the nexus of legality, energy, sustainability and ageing positions this paper’s focus as an integral linchpin to critically informed and inclusive urban design.
Community-based Studios for drawing Students’ Awareness of Universal Design Principles. Hing-Wah Chau, Academic Teaching Scholar, Victoria University
A series of community-based design studios were delivered at the University of Melbourne for postgraduate architectural students from 2017 to 2019 to draw their awareness of universal design principles and incorporate those principles in their design assignments.
A design studio is a place of experimentation and exploration. Students are encouraged to propose solutions to respond to our community needs. Bringing real-world issues into design studios enables students to equip themselves with the capabilities to formulate corresponding design strategies for built environment, especially to cater for the specific needs of people with disability and older adults.
Through the engagement with different stakeholders, including practising architects, urban designers, non-profit organisations and local council, students are required to assess the current site context and carry out site analysis, prepare precedent case studies, attend inclusive design workshops, prepare schematic design, leading to their detailed design and final presentations.
In this paper, the course structure of these community-based studios is firstly introduced, followed by an analysis illustrating how students’ awareness of universal design principles can be enhanced. Potential improvements are discussed and further guidance for replicating similar studios at other institutions are given.
Interoception as a universal design for learning strategy to support well-being and engagement in learning in education for all children and young people.
Emma Goodall, Manager Disability & Complex Needs, Department for Education South Australia
Children thrive at school when they are supported to attend, take in and process information, and interact positively with peers and educators. Children who are disenfranchised can struggle to emotionally self-regulate, and experience higher rates of disengagement and suspensions as well as poorer learning outcomes. A program in South Australia is indicating that teaching interoception skills to all students can positively influence their engagement and achievement in the classroom, and shift a school’s culture to being more pro-social.
This workshop will give a brief overview of interoception and its role in emotional cognition, expression and regulation. Interoception, the conscious perception of internal body signals, tends to be atypical in people with developmental disabilities, mental health disorders, trauma, intergenerational trauma and chronic stress. Participants will learn how to implement a range of interoception activities to support well-being and engagement in schools and other contexts, such as justice, mental health and aged care.
Participants will then be introduced to two practical tools to use with children and adults to support the development of self-awareness and connectedness in a positive and non-judgmental manner. These tools are being used in over 150 schools and preschools across South Australia as well as schools in New Zealand as a universal design for learning strategy. Participants have shown improvements in interoceptive awareness over time, and demonstrated more effective self-regulation and pro-social behaviour.
Professionals who understand the people they are working with can effectively support their well-being and engagement in learning. The activities and practical skills learned in this workshop are equally applicable in the home, and can be used by families.
|11:20||Creating communication accessible public transport services for everyone, everywhere, everyday.
Georgia Burn, Communication Access Coordinator, Scope
By the end of 2019, five components of public transport services in Melbourne, Victoria, will be accredited with the Communication Access Symbol. This means that every passenger, including people with communication disabilities, can communicate with trained staff when travelling around Melbourne and Victoria. Historically, the accessibility of public transport has focused predominantly on physical access. However, making transport services accessible and inclusive not only includes making the physical and built environment accessible, but true inclusion also involves creating services that consider and accommodate the social environment as well. “Communication access occurs when people are respectful and responsive to individuals with communication disabilities, and when strategies and resources are used to support successful communication” (Solarsh et al, 2013). The Communication Access Symbol was launched in 2011 and aims to award businesses who have undergone an accreditation process in order to improve their customer service with customers who have a communication disability.
In Melbourne, Australia, the governing body that oversees public transport is the Department of Transport; with a range of contracted operators connecting passengers to the community across train, tram and bus networks. Several operators, including V/Line regional rail, Public Transport Victoria (PTV) call centre, five PTV hubs, Yarra Trams and Metro Trains Melbourne (MTM) have all recognised the importance of communication access and engaged in the Communication Access Symbol accreditation process. This presentation will describe the communication access journey for these public transport providers, and present case studies on the communication access movement that is occurring more broadly.
|How to best teach Universal Design to design students at TAFE? A presentation of results; regarding teacher and coordinator recommendations, new ideas and potential new projects.
Bec Renton, Health and Science Research Student, Deakin University
Universal Design (UD) is a well promoted design tool within global, national and state policy. UD is used in the design process to create accessible built environments, which in turn promote health and wellbeing to all. To achieve the benefits of UD, architectural professionals must learn the skills to implement UD in practice. This study will explore current policy and legislation promoting UD as well as analysing a current vocational building and design architectural course to examine to what extent current course curriculum incorporates UD and how much this aligns with the levels promoted in policy. Interviews with course coordinators and teachers will then gain insight into current architectural educator perspectives and understandings of the concept of UD as well as gaining further insight into what is taught and what is believed to be the best way to incorporate UD content into the curriculum.
This research project aimed to see what levels UD and accessibility beyond compliance were being taught within a Victorian Vocational Architectural Design course, the study then aimed to gain teacher and coordinator perspectives on UD and its philosophy, how they are teaching UD, if at all, and also how they feel UD could best be taught to students in the future. The presentation will discuss the results, and will talk about potential ideas for implementing the recommendations from participants.
Keywords: universal design; architecture; education; inclusive design; accessibility; curriculum; vocational; beyond compliance.
It’s the little things that count: A case study of an age and dementia friendly streetscape. Guy Luscombe, Principal, Systems Architects
With over 90% of older people opting to live at home as they age and some 70% of people with dementia staying in their home environments, the case for a universally designed neighbourhood becomes even more important. Moonee Valley City Council, realising that the particularly large number of older people ageing in place in its area, developed a ‘toolkit’ to assist them to implement more age and dementia friendly public spaces.
“Age’n’dem” as it became known, used existing evidence and a user reference group to develop ‘tools’ – practical advice, guidelines and techniques – to guide those given the task of planning, designing, building and maintaining these spaces. But did it work?
Is occupation the missing link to advancing the universal design of public built environments? Valerie Watchorn, Lecturer, Deakin University
This presentation will outline findings from an integrated literature review on the universal design of built environments and recent research that extends on these findings.
The Person-Environment-Occupation model was used as a theoretical framework to synthesise literature published on universal design and built environments between 2011 – 2017. Thirty-three peer-reviewed journal articles were included, and findings revealed that much of the current discourse focuses on the person and the environment, with the occupations carried out in built environments and the interaction between these domains not referred to in much detail. This gap in literature highlights a need for further knowledge on how people interact with, and use, built environments for meaningful activity and social participation. Although such information on the usability of environments has the potential to strengthen the empirical basis of universal design and advance its application, perceptions of usability are subjective and difficult to collate at population levels. Findings from a recent scoping study on the evaluation of universal design in public built environments suggest that involving user-experts, particularly people with lived experience of disability, in design processes can provide valuable insight into designing for usability not just accessibility. However, it is not known who should be included as user-experts and what factors serve as barriers and facilitators to the meaningful participation of people with disabilities in design processes. Research is currently underway to examine how co-design processes may serve to advance the universal design of public built environments.
Table Topics during Lunch:
Everyone, Everywhere: Exploring the interface of Communication Access for People with Communication Disabilities with the Principles of Universal Design.
The ability to socially interact and participate in community life are essential components of social inclusion. People with communication disabilities are vulnerable to social exclusion, due to challenges with communicating. People with communication disabilities may experience a range of communication difficulties of physical, sensory, cognitive/intellectual, neurological and/or psychosocial origins.
Since 2011, Scope (Aust.) has worked with businesses, services and organisations within Victoria, Australia, to create communication accessible communities, and award eligible services with the Communication Access Symbol. Communication access has attempted to act as a vehicle for the social inclusion of people with communication disabilities. It is said to occur when “people are respectful and responsive to individuals with communication disabilities, and when strategies are used to support successful communication”. This grass-roots initiative has gained world-wide momentum, with early-adopters now building this communication access movement globally in places such as Canada and the UK, and has prompted an increasing number of businesses and organisations to seek this accreditation as part of Accessibility Action Plans or wider organisational policy. In 2018, Speech Pathology Australia established the National Communication Access Alliance, and has embarked on a project to develop national communication access standards working in collaboration with Standards Australia.
A systematic literature review study was conducted, which aimed to ascertain the key elements of universal design to provide a basis for which communication access can be compared. Universal Design relating to the Built Environment, Learning, and Web Accessibility were explored and considered in relation to communication access. Findings and future work will be discussed.
When it is not legislated: How can we improve access and inclusion in public toilets?
The legal framework provides the foundations for the planning, design, provision, construction, operation and maintenance of public toilets. As part of research towards Churchill Fellowship in six countries, a commonality across each of the places I visited was that there was no legislative requirement for government to provide toilets in public spaces. However, when toilets are provided, their construction must meet international and national standards and the relevant building codes. The provision of and access to toilets is intrinsically linked to achieving other government strategies, especially those related to physical activity and tourism. Hence the importance of legislation, ordinance and by-laws was a consistent theme across many of the meetings.
In Wales, the Public Health Act (2017), requires local authorities to develop toilet strategies. “By working with local partners and those affected by continence issues, the toilet strategy will have to assess the need for toilets locally and will set out the steps the local authority propose to take to increase access to toilets in their area.” (Crohn’s & Colitis UK). The legislation also ensures that local authorities will need to coordinate to consider access to toilets along key transport routes and within cultural venues and events. While the Wales Public Health Act 2017 does not mandate the provision of public toilets the strategy must include a local assessment of need and how the local authority will address the local need. In this table topic discussion let’s discuss what legislation and policy is required to progress inclusive and accessible public toilet provision in Australia.
Inclusive Design: An International Case for Good Design and Good Business
In this table topic session, the author leverages her international experience as an industry professional and PhD candidate in the built environment to facilitate a discussion about Inclusive Design (ID) from a global point of view. The session will begin with an overview of similar design principles—namely, Inclusive Design, Universal Design, and Design for All in addition to the less frequently used People-centred Design and Accessible Design terms. While these approaches are similar, there are differences among them, primarily due to their historical origins and evolution over time. To ensure consistent group understanding, we will review this nuance and provide the current corresponding definition of each term.
Following the introductory conversation, the primary focus of the session will be to discuss as a group similarities and differences among terms, highlight positive and negative aspects of ID-related projects (some which will be presented and some which will be sought out from participants), and review recent company and government policy changes that have been enacted worldwide for ethical and business purposes.
In addition to serving as a smart and fair way to design, Inclusive Design has become a global hot topic over the past five-ten years. Expert perspectives on this newfound popularity will be shared with the group and examined collaboratively in the context of the world and Australia in particular. Participating in this session is expected to enable group members to develop a better understanding of Inclusive Design-related terms, identify best and worst practices for implementation, and foster an appreciation for how and why Inclusive Design, as Design and Architecture Norway (DOGA) states, is a “low-cost, high return way to generate new ideas” and has therefore become “[not only about good intentions, but also good business]”.
Local Government UD Network Lunchtime Eat and Meet with Virginia Richardson
|Walking tour Guy Luscombe (registration required)|
|1:30- 2:15||Panel Session: The State of Play for Inclusive Tourism
– Panel Members: Martin Heng, Nicole Healy and Sarah Seddon. Moderator: Margaret Kay
|2:40||Design Matters to make well spaces.
Michael Walker, Principal Advisor Universal Design, Victorian Health and Human Services
The presentation will discuss and demonstrate the links to relevant human rights instruments; provides evidence for the problems the policy sets out to address. It will discuss biophilic approaches to design, the use of colour and MSE (multi – sensory environments) environments in the health space.br/>
Case studies include; Emergency departments and Autism, Aged care and mental health. Aged care design and Youth Prevention and recovery centre. Alcohol and other Drug Residential rehabilitation facility.
|Accessible Events – A Multi-dimensional Approach to Temporary Universal Design.
Tina Merk, Engineer, Zayed Higher Organization for People of Determination, UAE.
|3:30||Housing older Australians: wants, needs and innovative inclusive approaches.
Kelli Dendle and Guy Luscombe, Principal, Systems Architects
Unmet demand for appropriate, accessible and affordable housing for the large emerging cohort of older Australians is increasing due to inadequate supply, reduction in homeownership among older adults, growing need for universal design features, and a preference for ageing-in-place. Exploring innovative and inclusive housing models for people as they age is critical.
While the raw numbers of housing options for older people may be rising, e.g. retirement villages, many options are marketed on a full cost-recovery basis, requiring considerable entry capital and restricting future flexibility for residents. Affordable housing options are frequently located on urban fringes with concomitant disadvantages e.g. lack of proximity to services. Better located or universally designed housing suitable for ageing-in-place is in low supply and unaffordable for all but the relatively wealthy.
The presentation will: stimulate discussion in this space; Influence and prompt policy which enables and promotes appropriate residential models; Influence residential design, funding and delivery approaches; Stimulate people to think more holistically outside their area of specialty; and lead to further collaborative projects that increase knowledge and improve housing for older people.
|Aligning enabling environments for people with autism and dementia within universal design
Terri Preece, Environmental Design Consultant, Dementia Training Australia, and Shelly Dival, Autism Design Specialist, Enabling Spaces.
Dementia is the single greatest cause of disability in older Australians. While 3 in 10 people are over the age of 85 and almost 1 in 10 people over the age of 65 have dementia, it is not considered a normal part of the ageing process (NATSEM (2016) Economic Cost of Dementia in Australia 2016-2056).
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is often considered a hidden disability. It can go undiagnosed and it is not a condition recognisable by a person’s physical appearance. An estimated 1 in 70 people in Australia are diagnosed with ASD. It is a lifelong condition. What do these disabilities have in common? They are conditions that affect the brain and behaviour such as socialisation, communication and the perception of their environments.
Terri Preece has been consistently applying evidence-based dementia friendly principles in residential and public environments and believes dementia friendly design is enabling for everyone, including ASD. Shelly Dival has explored the connections between ASD and creating more enabling living environments and believes the guidelines can be applied to a much broader range of disabilities, including dementia.
How much does designing environments for people with dementia and autism actually have in common? What are the similarities and the differences between designing for the 2 disabilities? Is it just about sensory perception or is there more to be unpacked? And can creating a coordinated approach still meet the individual requirements of the person with dementia and the person with ASD? This presentation will share practical knowledge and expertise to better understand how to align designing for these two disabilities into a more inclusive design approach under the one umbrella of universal design.
|3:50||Supporting beneficial housing models in a dynamic disability housing market: a cross-sectoral response.
Linda Martin-Chew, Senior Strategic Policy Planner, City of Whittlesea.
The City of Whittlesea supports one of the fastest growing communities in Victoria, with a population of 220,000 and more than 12 housing developers active across the municipality. Whittlesea also supports a significant population of residents with disability and an established disability housing sector, historically dominated by institutional and group home accommodation. In 2016, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) rolled out across the municipality, offering substantial investment to grow a Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) market. This investment represented a unique opportunity for residents with the highest levels of support needs to move beyond the bounds of institutional living into housing that approximated a mainstream experience of home.
This presentation tells the story of the City of Whittlesea’s journey into this emerging disability housing market, initially pulled in by the advances of speculative developers but then deliberately exploring the opportunities to progress the Council’s strong policy commitment to accessible and affordable housing.
Feeding this local intelligence into the policy planning and review cycle, Council developed strategies to reduce barriers to the supply of appropriate disability housing and strengthen industry engagement to promote accessible design and housing models of benefit to the whole community.
|Different Buildings for Different Minds – Designing spaces and places for autism while creating truly inclusive communities.
Shelly Dival, Autism Design Specialist, Enabling Spaces
Individuals with Autism often incur social, educational and economic challenges and discrimination. Autism can impact many facets of a person’s life, including the way a person relates to his or her environment. Interaction with our built environment can be particularly debilitating with social isolation and the inability to work effectively being just two examples of the impact of a poor environment. Currently in Australia there is minimal expertise across industry and government in understanding how to create neurological inclusive environments. Autism is the single largest disability group for participants of the NDIS at 29%.Combined with other neurological groups, the number climbs to 2/3rd of participants with no physical disability. Yet our building codes and policies, and community and industry models for inclusion only take into account physical disability.
To create truly inclusive communities we need to change the way we approach building design and community planning by ensuring neurological consideration in our decision making. Drawing on over 20 years in building design, reflecting on global research undertaken through a Churchill Fellowship, and her role as an international advisory board member for research, the author, whose work is gaining national and international attention, will take conference participants on a tour of global best practice in architecture when designing for autism. How architecture relates to, and enhances other services and programs to create enabling spaces for people with autism, others in the community such as those with dementia and even the neuro-typical.
Applied to the Australian context the discussion will include the current state of programs and research regarding autism and the built environment and how Australia has the opportunity to collaborate on a global scale and rise from having a limited knowledge base to becoming a leader in the field while working towards true inclusion policy and practice.
|4:10||Altering Housing DNA– the Lifemark story.
Helen James, Sales Manager, Lifemark.
Jack Mulholland, Metro Access Officer, Maroondah City Council
Australian Building Standards for accessibility of the built environment for people with a disability focus on people who use wheelchairs; access and facilities for people with ambulatory disabilities; and access for people with hearing or vision impairments. The standards do not include neurodiverse conditions such as autism, ADHD, and other cognitive conditions. Australian Building Standards continue to lag behind changes in society where we find buildings that may be accessible for one disability but not accessible for another. A universal design approach ensures buildings are accessible for all, thus meeting all the community needs.
Recently there has been a significant increase in people diagnosed with autism, as highlighted by the NDIS where 30% of approved plans are for people with autism. Autism can include sensory overload where every sense is heightened; every noise, colour and movement is intensified. As a result, both individuals and families can find places such as shopping centres, sporting stadiums, airports, and other public spaces extremely challenging.
Places that require walking through crowds, interacting with people and undergoing instructions, can be highly stressful for people with Autism. Sensory spaces are being introduced to the built environment allowing families to shop free of anxiety, attend football matches as a family, and to experience travel for the first time. For these places a sensory room offers a quiet space to reduce anxiety and over-stimulation with access to sensory soothing items in an environment free of smell and bright lights.
These rooms also create a safe environment for people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder who can also experience sensory overload. People with dementia can also find an environment that encourages sensory stimulation.
|4:30||Designing with the Digital Divide to Design Technology for All.
Jenna Mikus, QUT.
Recent practice articulates the proven value of technology and the interest and ability of older adults in technology use. However, of the technologies that have been studied and considered “successful”, many have not been accepted by older adults. This is not because the users are considered “laggards” on Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory curve. Instead, practice states it is because they tend to be left out of the originating design process. This has led to technology that meets “average” user specifications but is deemed ineffective for “edge” demographics due to “significant mismatches between the needs and preferences of the users and the products that are developed to fulfill their needs”.
Don Norman, a former Apple executive, a current university professor, and an older adult himself, believes that “the world seems designed against the elderly” and proclaims that older adults are “not a niche market” and are “good customers…often with more free time and discretionary income”. This is not only an idea discussed in industry and by Norman who bridges industry and academia. Alan Newell and Ann Light, in addition to Bernard Isaacs and others, extol the virtues of designing for the old to design for the young in their research, rather than designing for the young to exclude the old. In short, as Light says, “by involving older adults in the design process and by taking their lived experience into account, a designer can design for other demographics.”
|Mainstreaming visual contrast in built, transport and information environments for everyone, everywhere, everyday.
Penny Galbraith, Galbraith Scott (Virtual Presentation)
Vision is our dominant sense and is the process of deriving meaning from what is seen. Half the human brain is devoted directly or indirectly to vision (MIT, 1996). In the brain, visual processing accounts for about 30% of the cortex, compared with 8% for touch and 3% for hearing (Seyens, 2019). About 80% percent of our perception, learning, cognition, and activities are mediated through vision. The visual process generates appropriate motor, and/or cognitive responses to the world around us (Brainline, 2019). This is why people with an acquired brain injury often have a vision impairment.
Visual contrast sensitivity is a crucial part of human vision (different to acuity) allowing detection of objects and discriminating objects or details from their background. Poor visual contrast therefore has a very significant impact on people with a vision impairment.
Worldwide, luminance contrast has been recognised in Standards and Codes for new buildings, transport and information, as the most relevant measure of how a person visually perceives their environment. Luminance contrast is recognised as crucial for safety and is vital to remove environmental barriers for people with a vision impairment. However, luminance contrast is a tiny fraction of compliance and neglected in maintenance of existing assets.
This paper describes human vision in more detail and why providing luminance contrast is so important to universal design and to removing environmental barriers. The paper will also propose a new research-based approach to measure luminance contrast to make it a mainstream concern for everyone, everywhere, everyday.
|5:00||DAY ONE Close|
Universal Design Conference – Day Two: Tuesday 18 May 2021
|9:15-10:00||Keynote: Debunking Myths Around Ageing and Work
Professor Philip Taylor, Institute for Employment and Work, Federation University
|10:05||TBA – Fiona Morrison, Director, Open Space, NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment|
|11:00||Access and Inclusion in Public Toilets: Impacts on social and economic participation.
Katherine Webber, Consultant
The toilet – WC, bathroom, restroom, loo, dunny, outhouse – is an essential piece of infrastructure for everybody regardless of location, race, gender, disability and age. Its provision in public1 supports essential human functions. Toilets are a space where people expose their most vulnerable body parts in an effort to achieve health outcomes. In addition to eliminating bodily waste, people use toilets to administer essential medication, menstrual management, caring for young children, supporting others to use the facilities, finding a quiet place to rest, or accessing drinking water. In every country of the world, if provided, public toilets are spaces that are too often poorly designed or located, avoided if possible, perceived as dangerous, and are removed rather than improved because they are regarded as an expenditure and liability rather than a right. If a person or group of people is unable to locate, access or use a public toilet, their use and participation of the public space that the toilet is in is limited, therefore restricting their full involvement as a citizen.
This presentation will present some of the findings from over 30 conversations with community groups, advocates, local government, and industry in the United States of America, Canada, UK, Ireland, The Netherlands and Germany, exploring how they are developing innovative solutions to support inclusive and accessible public toilets. Ultimately the planning, provision and maintenance of public toilets supports the dignity, humanity and human rights of people.
Reframing Universal Design: Creating Short Videos for Inclusion
Workshop presenter: Dr Janice Rieger, Senior Lecturer, Queensland University of Technology.
In this workshop, participants will view four short design videos, and reflect on how videos can be created to enact change and broaden our thinking about universal design. As well as discussing practical considerations of different audiences, filming logistics, content, methods, participants, etc., this workshop will highlight the importance of inclusion in videos (e.g., the use of captions). The four featured videos will showcase designing for disability in houses, urban spaces and public institutions in Australia and Canada.
Videos are a powerful medium that can be used across all sectors to inform best practice in universal design and contribute towards inclusive and thriving communities. The suite of resources presented in this workshop through a series of experiential activities offer new ways to understand inclusion and generate innovative and accessible solutions.
The workshop will highlight how inclusive videos have the ability to impact spatial design, education and policy development. It will introduce innovative ways to communicate with our stakeholders everywhere and everyway, beyond plans, policies and document.
|11:20||Easy English: A critical addition to Universal Design for Everyone, Everywhere, Everyday.
Cathy Basterfield, Consultant
This paper will present international literacy data (OECD, 2013, ABS,2013) which identified 44% of the adult Australian population do not have the literacy to manage a range of day to day reading tasks, nor have the skills, knowledge or hardware to access web based written information. The data for computer-based problem solving identified 66% of Australian adults do not have the skills and knowledge to meaningfully engage with web-based materials. These are not marginal groups of people in our community. They are our neighbours, friends, older people, people who may be ill, have a disability or had limited educational opportunities. They are also Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and many people with English as a second language.
These people need to access meaningful written information. Consider leasing a home, negotiating a loan, finding a job, to taking a holiday, learning something new, accessing health services, attending a festival, making a complaint about a built environment and just being part of an inclusive community.
It is 13 years since the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with a Disability (2006) was enacted. There are specific Articles in the Convention which identify access to information. Developing written information in Easy English needs to be considered as an integral part of Universal Design.
This paper will present case studies of organisations who have adopted the use of Easy English as a Universal Design strategy, and the positive outcomes for these organisations and the people they engage with when Easy English has been introduced. The introduction of Easy English assists Everyone, Everywhere, Everyday reducing many hidden barriers and building inclusion. Let’s include Easy English in all Universal Design journeys.
|11:40||Universal design in housing: Reporting on Australia’s obligations to the UNCRPD.
Margaret Ward, Co-Convenor Australian Network for Universal Housing Design
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) obliges Australia, as a State Party, to embrace the concept of universal design as a guide for its activities. The UNCRPD triggered significant changes in the last decade directed by the 2010-2020 National Disability Strategy (the Strategy), with its vision for an inclusive Australian society that enables people with disability to fulfil their potential as equal citizens.
This presentation reviews Australia’s national and international reports on these obligations over the last decade focusing on Australia’s response to the Strategy’s commitment in 2011 to support the ‘National Dialogue agreement’, a self-regulatory approach to incorporate universal design in housing. It argues that the both the Australian governments and the housing industry largely disregarded the National Dialogue agreement, and misrepresented to the United Nations the progress made in achieving accessibility within the housing stock. It evidences the importance of advocacy and a direct line of communication to the United Nations from people with lived experience, something the United Nations relied on to discover that the National Dialogue agreement had failed.
Given this past disregard and willingness to misrepresent the facts, the Australian governments will need to be monitored closely in the consideration of a minimum access standard for all housing in the National Construction Code. The question remains whether a net benefit to society will be found to be of greater priority than the self-interests of the private housing sector and the political vagaries of government. Again, it will take the voice of people with lived experience and those who represent them to make the argument.
|12:00||Designing for All – Cross Cultural Considerations.
Geoff Barker, Principal, PM&D Architects (Virtual Presentation)
|12:20||Posters and visit to ATSA Expo|
Understanding the differences among Universal Design and Inclusive Design implementation: Context of Indonesian Public Library
The promotion and protection of the rights of Persons with Disabilities is central to the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (UNCPRPD) which also adopted in Republic of Indonesia. Following the recommendation of UNCRPD, several Indonesian national regulations advocate for the rights of Persons with Disabilities (PwDs) and Universal Design implementation. The legislation operates over three levels adding to the complexity of disability-related policies in the country. However, the implementation of the Indonesian regulations remains problematic with many buildings, especially public libraries.
In response to such barriers, previous studies suggest to improve the educational facilities and services. Recognising that public libraries role in educational provision of PwDs, this study will identify the barriers and opportunities for the Universal Design (UD) or Inclusive Design (ID) of Public Libraries in Indonesia and Australia. In this initial stage, Both UD and ID concept are evaluated because of the USA and the UK design process model facilitating PwDs and older people. Despite of the difference, both concepts will be discussed for this PhD study.
This study will involve an exploration of an Indonesian and Australian Public Library. In particular, the study aims to investigate the barriers and key success points of implementing Inclusive Design (ID) in public libraries from Indonesian and Australian stakeholders’ perspectives. The purpose of this study is to create an ecological model of the stakeholders’ participation in ID implementation in Indonesia and Australia. This study uses a Grounded Theory (GT) methodology supported by Case Study Research (CSR), and Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) framework. The study will utilise document evaluation, stakeholder interviews, and walkthrough evaluations of the selected case libraries.
Defining Eudaemonic Design at Home, using Creative Methods and Co-design with Older Adults
People spend more than 90% of their time indoors. As a consequence, buildings are key influencers on the health and vitality of the people who inhabit them. Recent research details the possibility of designing buildings for positive health impacts. To date, most health-based design has stemmed from architectural science-based principles. This paper explores a new approach, based in philosophy but developed using positive psychology research, that is now being applied to the built environment. It centres around the term Eudaemonia, which originated with Plato but was most notably defined by Aristotle as “being one’s best self” and experiencing thriving, flourishing health.
Inclusive Built Environment for Malaysian Heritage Mosque
Mosque accessibility has been an issue for some time and it is still a problem that needs to be rectified in particular the heritage mosque in Malaysia, either national listed mosque or any historical heritage mosques. Heritage buildings have been coping with the demands of providing accessibility for Persons with Disabilities (PwDs) and mosque is a priority as mosque is one of the building typologies that is most visited and used by the public whether heritage listed or not. Making Malaysian heritage mosque accessible is an effort of its own as it will have modification and renovation barriers that contradicts with the heritage building planning policies and requirements. The aim is to identify the common accessibility obstacles and provide recommendations or innovation design solutions to accommodate access design that complement heritage preservation views. The challenge would be implementing access design according to Malaysian Standard MS1184 and at the same time complementing heritage design guidelines preservation concerns for the chance of social inclusion for any mosque environment and activities. As a summary, these efforts of making heritage mosque inclusive and accessible will benefit accessible tourism that will contribute to Malaysian economy as well as promoting inclusive Muslim cities.
|1:40||Universal Design and Playspaces ‘from Concept to Completion’.
Evan Wilkinson, Regional Coordinator, Sport and Recreation Victoria
For the past decade Sport and Recreation Victoria has been playing a leading role with the application of Universal Design principles into community sport and active recreation facilities across Victoria, with the goal to enable and empower a diverse population by improving human performance, health and wellness and encouraging social participation.
Spoken from the funding partner’s perspective the presentation will address the different stages of this project’s lifecycle and how the principles of Universal Design were considered along the journey from the initial funding application and design phase through to the completed project.
The presentation will also discuss the benefits of the funding partnership between State and Local Government and whether or not the inclusion of the principles was successful in practice, the involvement of SRV as the funding partner during the design phase and how well the completed project was able to deliver an inclusive and innovative play space.
FLASH TALK & PANEL SESSION:
Universal Design and Adaptive Technology, a discussion on the barriers to using adaptive technology and possible future design solutions from an Occupational Therapy Perspective.
Universal Design – Who? Where? When?
User Centred Design in the Built Environment
In our presentation, we explore the benefits of a using an inclusive user centred design approach in the built environment. We’ll discuss how we identified accessibility and inclusive performance requirements across a range of project types during different stages of the design process.
Investigating the needs of the people you’re designing for helps to identify opportunities that improve the fit between end-users and their environment. Gathering insights on how people interact with their environments and undertake everyday activities can inform and direct better design and business decisions.
Design can create environments, buildings, spaces and products that enhance or restrict a sense of belonging, increase or reduce feelings of security, stretch or limit boundaries, promote or reduce mobility and improve or damage health. Design can remove real and imagined barriers between communities and promote engagement, independence and possibility.
We believe in the power of design to make a difference and to make better experiences for everyone – redefining our experiences of moving, seeing, hearing, touching and smelling. Design that considers the needs of a broad range of people can enable health, wellness and social participation.
Evaluating Support, Technology and Built Design
In recent times, Australians with complex care needs have seen their housing options increase via the development of housing demonstration projects (HDPs). HDPs are based on the premise that well located, appropriately designed housing – combined with quality support – can increase independence, wellbeing and community integration, while reducing lifetime care costs. The considerable amount of planning behind the built, technology and support design within HDPs has been clearly documented, and represents significant capital investment for funders. It is therefore important to understand how these environments are being used by those who reside within them. This research aims to explore how design and technology features, built into HDPs, are used by tenants, and how each of these environmental factors influence tenant participation at home.
Participants are people with disability and complex needs, aged 18-65, who have recently moved into an HDP. Semi-structured interviews will be undertaken 3-6 months post move to gain the perspective of participants on their use of, and interaction with, the built, technology and support environments. At one month following, a time sampling methodology will be employed to collect data via observation, to document the interaction between each of these environmental factors. A final interview will be undertaken to discuss the research team’s observation of the participant’s interaction with the built, technology and support environments.
|2:00||Everyone Can Play; Collaboration from Commencement to Implementation.
Fiona Morrison, Director Open Space, NSW Department of Planning
In 2017 NSW committed to making playspaces better places for everyone. Over a 15 month period, the NSW Government worked closely with stakeholders, government and community to establish a program that would meet community needs and make long lasting change.
People came together from across government, industry and the design sector to develop policy and a funding program that would promote innovation, design excellence and best practice for inclusive play in NSW.
Over more than 6,000 hours, opinions were shared, perspectives were exposed, and minds were opened to a new way of policy creation. Collaboration was the foundation of this policy. Collaboration and innovation are central to its ongoing implementation.
|2:20||Universal design in local government: participatory action research findings.
Adam Johnson, Edith Cowan University
In 2014 the City of Bunbury in Western Australia set an aspirational goal to become the Most Accessible Regional City in Australia (MARCIA), acting upon a recommendation from their Disability Access and Inclusion Committee. In partnership with Edith Cowan University, a 3-year participatory action study was established to investigate systemic barriers to universal access in the design of City services and infrastructure, and how internal policies, procedures and design culture shape decision-making. The research was conducted in collaboration with people with lived experience of disability.
Historically, universal design has been minimally and inconsistently applied by local governments in the development of ‘public infrastructure’, which includes buildings, facilities, services, information and events intended for use by the public. The study identified five key barriers and facilitators of universal design in public infrastructure, and developed a model of Universal Public Design that may be usefully applied in other public design contexts, including other local governments, other tiers of government, and the commercial sector.
A defining feature of this PhD study was its methodology, which used Participatory Action Research (PAR) to position people with lived experience of disability as researchers and activists, engaged in a concurrent process of inquiring, sharing and influencing. Eleven people were recruited as co-researchers, working alongside a PhD candidate who adopted the role of facilitator and ‘animator’ in addition to researcher. Together, they engaged informants from the City of Bunbury (elected members, executives, managers and technical officers) in deliberative dialogue about the City’s role in in public design.
The presentation will share the findings from the study and discuss the process of PAR, using examples and illustrations drawn from the engagement experience. The presentation will also touch on progress made since the research recommendations were adopted by Council in 2018.
|2:40||Inclusive Town Project
Nikki Williams, Senior Inclusive Communities Officer, City of Greater Bendigo
|3:30||Panel Session: Promoting and Implementing Universal Design: A Government Perspective
Virginia Richardson, Disability Inclusion, Mornington Peninsula Shire, Leader LGUDN
Fiona Morrison, Director Open Space, NSW Department of Planning
Michael Walker, Principal Advisor Universal Design, Victorian Health and Human ServicesModerator: TBA